Russian dossier11/20/2022 ![]() ![]() In the nearly five years since its release, many of the most explosive accusations compiled by former British intelligence officer Christopher Steele - including the alleged existence of a so-called pee tape - remained unverified or have been fully disproven. Last year, Kevin Clinesmith, a former FBI lawyer, admitted altering an email related to the surveillance of Trump aide Carter Page.The Steele dossier, a collection of unverified intelligence that alleged deep levels of cooperation between the Trump campaign and Russian government during the 2016 presidential campaign, has been the source of intense debate from the moment it was published in January 2017. The Justice Department's inspector-general has faulted the FBI and the Justice Department for their handling of the dossier.Ĭybersecurity lawyer Michael Sussmann has pleaded not guilty to lying to the FBI during a 2016 conversation, with Mr Durham's team saying he concealed from the FBI that he was presenting the concerns as a lawyer for the Clinton campaign. The indictment says Mr Danchenko had sourced one or more allegations in the dossier anonymously to that Clinton associate, who is not named in court papers. The indictment says Mr Danchenko misled the FBI by denying that he had discussed any allegations in the dossier with a contact of his who worked as a public relations executive and was also a long-time Democratic operative who campaigned for Ms Clinton. That dossier, the target of intense derision from Mr Trump, was ultimately provided to the FBI and used by federal authorities as they applied for and received surveillance warrants targeting a former Trump campaign aide.Īccording to the indictment, Mr Danchenko repeatedly lied to the FBI about his sources of information and that deception mattered because the FBI "devoted substantial resources attempting to investigate and corroborate the allegations" in the dossier and had "relied in large part" on that research in obtaining the surveillance warrants.Ī lawyer for Mr Danchenko had no immediate comment. Mr Danchenko, a US-based Russian who had specialised in Russian and Eurasian matters as an analyst at the Brookings Institution think tank, was a significant source for Mr Steele as he compiled his dossier. The five-count indictment accuses Mr Danchenko of making multiple false statements to the FBI when interviewed in 2017 about his role in collecting information for Christopher Steele, a former British spy who was paid by Democrats to investigate connections between Mr Trump and Russia. The case does not undercut investigators' findings that the Kremlin aided the Trump campaign - findings that were not based on the dossier - but it does endorse a longstanding concern that opposition research the FBI relied on in the Russia probe was marred by uncorroborated claims. The indictment is the third criminal case brought by Mr Durham and the second in two months. ![]() The case against Igor Danchenko is part of special counsel John Durham's ongoing investigation into the origins of the FBI's probe into whether Mr Trump's 2016 campaign and Russia had conspired to tip the outcome of that year's presidential election. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply.AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |